Research discussed in this article suggests that teaching style and methods have great consequences on student motivation and engagement. Teacher-centered styles foster situational, extrinsic motivation, instead of long-term, intrinsic motivation. In contrast, student-centered, learning-goal oriented styles increase self-efficacy; when understanding content, using strategies effectively, and linking new and prior knowledge to construct meaning are emphasized, students are more likely to be engaged.
So what specifically can we do to develop engaged and intrinsically motivated students? We can give students autonomy by allowing students to make choices about learning materials and tasks. We can provide real-world interactions by using concrete examples and/or hands-on activities to enhance text-based learning and improve achievement.We can provide interesting materials for instruction which will engage students and make them more motivated to learn. We can provide explicit reading and learning instruction to develop skills necessary for independent learning. We can provide opportunities for collaborative learning, enabling students to communicate ideas, to be exposed to multiple perspectives, and to construct meaning. And finally, possibly the most important thing we can do is be involved and engaged teachers who care about our students and take the time to get to know their interests and individual learning styles.The below figure from the article summarizes (with more detail) the instructional context engagement model of reading devolopment.
Although this article was specifically addressing reading engagment and motivation, I believe these techniques are generalizable to all learning activities and this article has provided me with a framework to foster engaged and motivated students.
Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D., & Barr R. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 403-422). New York: Erlbaum.
Good comments on Guthrie's work (his diagram, too). You're right, he's interested in Reading, in particular, but I do see many of the ideas as transferring to a broader set of tasks. He is responsible for helping to establish motivation as a driving idea in literacy education. Now everyone is talking about motivation and engagement. Technology, particularly the fact that we can select the hyperlinks and courses of action that we desire, also has had a big effect in establishing motivation and engagement on our radar.
ReplyDeleteI am glad you posted this because I thought it was really interesting. I especially liked Guthrie's thoughts on what it means to have a "coherent" classroom and alternate methods of engaging students. I also agree that these ideas could be used on a wide range of tasks.
ReplyDelete